Wednesday, November 14, 2007
Assignment # 12 - Fight For Internet Freedom
Up until this weeks assignment I had never heard the phrase network neutrality or have any clue as to what it is, so I was eager to find out what it is and what the debate over it is all about. Wikipedia vaguely refers to network neutrality as a principle that is applied to residential broadband networks, and potentially to all networks. What I think this means is that Internet users should be able to view any site they choose without limitations from their service provider. Under the current Telecommunications Act the bill states that certain classes of Internet providers "may not unreasonably" restrict applications or services, but there is no definition as to what "unreasonable" is. This reminds me of the video we watched in class on how the Chinese government patrols and polices the Internet so nothing bad is said about their government or nothing unwanted is leaked outside of the country and if Tiananmen Square of Tank Man is searched nice photos of the scenery are shown, not that massacre that took place there 17 years ago.
The current debate over network neutrality is whether to keep the Internet Service Providers (ISP'S) from discriminating between content. The net neutrality debate pits online computer services against a coalition of telephone utilities, telecommunications, and cable distributors-the companies that provide the content versus those that transmit it. The alliance opposed to the legislation includes AT&T Inc., BellSouth Corp., Verizon Communications, Comcast Corp., and the National Cable and Telecommunications Association; they advocate for a competitive Internet with minimal regulation. The list of active player in favor of network neutrality legislation includes Microsoft, Yahoo!, eBay Inc., Amazon.com, and Google Inc. (Source).
Whose interests are at stake are our own. The cable and phone companies who think they own the lines of communication are looking to pit companies like Google and Yahoo against each other for whose page loads faster and charge you a hefty price for what they consider a "better" Internet and for those of us who can not afford to pay they will have to take the scenic route and have much longer wait times for the pages to load. The ISP's, phone companies and corporate giants become a "gatekeeper" of sorts and are not interested in what is best for the consumer, they are interested in revenue and where their web site ranks. They are only interested in how their company is doing and taking out all of the small businesses that they can to increase their bottom line.
I support network neutrality because the Internet should be a level playing field for every voice out there to be heard no matter what their financial status, every e-mail should be read, every instant message should be answered and ever blog should get a comment. Just like us in our class, we are only college students that people otherwise wouldn't take seriously but in our blog we have a place to express our thought and feelings on the topic at hand each week, and get just as much respect for it as anyone else blogging. Without network neutrality you might not be able to read this because it could be blocked because it is something that a company may not want you to see. We should be able to go where we want on the Internet and see what we want to see by our own choice, not someone else's. Network neutrality is an important issue and after doing this assignment I'm glad I know more about how crucial it is to everyone.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
8 comments:
Yeah, I am for net neurality too((: Can't imagine what the world would be if competitors are vrying for the quickest and fastest upload of their websites.
I also support net neutrality. we should be able to view whatever it is that we want to view. thats why we pay our internet bill!!
I agree with Sam, especially because we pay so much for our internet here in the U.s.; we should be able to read, post, and access whatever we want on the net!
Network neutrality is definitely the best of the two sides. I wouldn't want to pay for access to the internet if it was that limited either, but I won't go as far as saying we should be able to access absolutely anything...at least not vital, personal information about anybody.
I agree with net neutrality. Just another ploy to make more money. OUTRAGEOUS!!
Like most of the other comments, i also agree with network neutrality. Without it, the internet would most likely be unfair to the values that most of us have.
I agree that net neutrality is in the best interest for the world. it allows to have access to information that is needed and couldn't be found. We already pay a good amount of money to gain access to the internet and that should be enough
Post a Comment